|email - August 2008|
James proves our point.
It is clear that many of the people who send us email don’t even bother to read what we have written, but disagree with it anyway. We received this email five days after the July newsletter was posted on-line.
I, like you, am retired. I am a geologist and I've been corresponding with one of your disciples. I noticed on your home page that you say:
the theory of evolution is not consistent with physical evidence and is no longer a respectable theory describing the origin and diversity of life.
Sir, what does EVOLVE mean? What is the definition?
It's CHANGE isn't it"
and that's all.
Evolution has nothing to say about the origin of life. That, like the definition of "theory," is one of the most abused terms in all of creationland.
You, no doubt, read that newsletter, and know that approximately 2/3 of it was devoted to the definition of “evolution.” You also know that we claimed evolutionists try to change the definition of “evolution” in order to avoid addressing the real issue. We want to thank James for proving us right.
|Quick links to|
|Science Against Evolution
|Back issues of
of the Month