|Stupid Evolutionist Quotes - January 2001|
|by Do-While Jones|
|“Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.” -- Theodosius Dobzhanski|
This quote has been repeated so often that it is generally accepted at face value without question. It appears on the Saint Louis University Department of Biology web page and a faculty web page at the Alabama School of Mathematics and Science.
Removing the double negative, it says, “Everything in biology makes sense only in the light of evolution.” If everything in biology is the result of evolution, then everything in biology should make sense in light of evolution. But many modern biological observations don’t make sense in light of the nineteenth-century theory of evolution. We pointed some of these things out to you in the last 51 months of the twentieth century, and plan to continue to do this every month now that we have entered the twenty-first century.
Elsewhere in this issue we reported on Evan Eisenberg’s struggle with the “adoption paradox” because adoption doesn’t make sense in light of evolution. Let’s look at more examples.
Here in the Mojave Desert we are also familiar with the AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missile. (It was designed here at China Lake.) How did an infrared seeker get connected to an autopilot which is connected to steering fins on a tube containing a rocket motor and high explosives attached to a triggering mechanism? Clearly, those things were consciously assembled to create something that destroys airplanes. It is just as clear that the venom delivery system in a sidewinder rattlesnake is a weapon system that is the result of planning and execution, not accident and selection.
It doesn’t make sense that poison would evolve in snakes. Nor does it make sense that similar chemical warfare systems would evolve in jellyfish, frogs, insects, and plants.
How does this make sense in light of evolution? What is the survival advantage of hanging helpless for a week or two? What series of genetic accidents could have caused this to happen? Why must a butterfly become an egg a second time and be born again?
One could argue that this makes sense in a world view that teaches that nature is full of spiritual object lessons; but it doesn’t make sense in a world view that teaches everything happens by chance, and the most advantageous processes survive while less efficient ones go extinct.
There are lots of other things that don’t make sense in light of evolution. We wrote about a few of them last September in the Stone Age Mutant Mammal Turtles essay. Breasts, pouches, and udders don’t make sense. Radical changes in respiratory and circulatory systems don’t make sense.
We are sure that if you think about it for a little while, you could come up with your own long list of things that don’t make sense in light of evolution.
We admit that there are a few things that do make sense in light of evolution. Selfishness, murder, rape, deceit, cannibalism, and racism, come immediately to mind. If evolution were true, these traits would help in the battle for survival, and would eventually manifest themselves in the surviving species. But just because people murder and commit rape doesn’t prove that evolution is true. There could be another explanation for this behavior.
|Quick links to|
|Science Against Evolution
|Back issues of
of the Month
For a more detailed explanation of the monarch’s life cycle, including some excellent pictures, see From Darkness to Light to Flight (Monarch-the Miracle butterfly) by Jules H. Poirier.